Nous lançons à la mi-juin, réservez votre consultation gratuite
Centre de connaissances

Connaissances expertes sur la SMP et la restauration capillaire.

Tout ce qu'il faut savoir sur la scalp micro pigmentation, la perte de cheveux, le camouflage de cicatrices et les soins post-opératoires, rédigé par des praticiens, pas par des marketeurs.

0

Articles

0

Sujets

Greffe capillaire

Mega Sessions vs. Two-Stage Plans — The Real Trade-off

5 min de lectureMay 2026
Mega Sessions vs. Two-Stage Plans — The Real Trade-off

A 6,000-graft single-day session sounds impressive on the brochure. The math behind why two 3,000-graft sessions usually outperform it.

The Trade-off Marketing Doesn’t Mention

A 6,000-graft single-day mega-session is a powerful sales pitch. It also packs every disadvantage into one day: more time out of body, more fatigue for the team, less time per channel, and a higher risk of survival loss.

The Math

Suppose two plans treat a Norwood V with 5,000 total grafts:

  • Plan A: one 5,000-graft mega session. At 80% survival → 4,000 living follicles.
  • Plan B: two 2,500-graft sessions, 12 months apart. At 92% survival → 4,600 living follicles.

Why Two Smaller Sessions Often Win

Smaller sessions allow the recipient area to fully heal between rounds. The donor is not depleted in a single day. The team works fresher. And — critically — you have a chance to assess the first round at 12 months and refine the second round's plan to reinforce only the areas where density is lacking.

When a Mega Session Makes Sense

Single mega-sessions are appropriate when (a) the patient cannot return for a second visit, (b) the donor capacity easily supports it, and (c) the team specifically maintains short out-of-body times across the day. They are not the right default for every case.